the daily misleader... a sample of the response from mcclennan:"White House spokesman Scott McClellan, echoing similar comments from top Administration officials, said that "this Administration made going after Al Qaida a top priority from very early on" in the face of increased terror warnings before 9/11"
The daily misleader footnotes show the above statement is simply wrong: the dates are wrong.
I had listened to Clarke saying that HE was told to minimize, but was NOT told to make a untrue case.
Nonetheless, he absolutely did. The time lines of information he presented earlier are materially different from that in his testimony. To that degree, he did quite exactly what Scott McClellan does above: he messed with the dates.
This is not to expose Clarke as a liar, but to understand the parameters of an "untrue case": apparently, the time line can be changed. Surely, if the time line is changed, then the number of meeting that occur within that shifted time line change. So, if the daily mislead says there were x meetings, but alters the time lines, then you have x meetings BEFORE a certain event rather than after.
If you close the barn door, it matters very much WHEN you did it. You CANNOT shift the time line. Yet, even with Clarke, that was permitted behavior in "minimizing" embarasment.
There is a BIG problem in this country: we do NOT know the rules of the game in minimizing embarassment!
While Clarke was working for the White House, he altered the dates to minimize embarassment. It is wonderful that he apologized. But one must note that he chose WHEN to apologize, when to let the country know the obvious, that the government had failed, but he withheld what was indeed a smoking gun: the government was actively looking elsewhere at the time.
But shit, we knew THAT too: we knew about missle defense, etc.
